This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
This article argues that, to properly employ the PEG ratio criterion for the determination of under/overvalued shares, the traditional benchmark of 1 is not appropriate and the benchmark employed must be customized to the share, i.e., it must reflect that share’s specific EPS growth rate and cost of equity. Invoking the constant growth model of share valuation, a formula for the suitable benchmark is developed. Graphs which illustrate the functional dependence of the benchmark on its determinants are presented, and the errors induced due to the use of the incorrect customary benchmark of unity are investigated.
- © 2009 Pageant Media Ltd
Log in using your username and password
Purchase access
In this issue
Jump to section
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.